65 lines
		
	
	
		
			3.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			65 lines
		
	
	
		
			3.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
While some other iconv(3) implementations - like FreeBSD iconv(3) - choose
 | 
						|
the "many small shared libraries" and dlopen(3) approach, this implementation
 | 
						|
packs everything into a single shared library. Here is a comparison of the
 | 
						|
two designs.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
* Run-time efficiency
 | 
						|
  1. A dlopen() based approach needs a cache of loaded shared libraries.
 | 
						|
  Otherwise, every iconv_open() call will result in a call to dlopen()
 | 
						|
  and thus to file system related system calls - which is prohibitive
 | 
						|
  because some applications use the iconv_open/iconv/iconv_close sequence
 | 
						|
  for every single filename, string, or piece of text.
 | 
						|
  2. In terms of virtual memory use, both approaches are on par. Being shared
 | 
						|
  libraries, the tables are shared between any processes that use them.
 | 
						|
  And because of the demand loading used by Unix systems (and because libiconv
 | 
						|
  does not have initialization functions), only those parts of the tables
 | 
						|
  which are needed (typically very few kilobytes) will be read from disk and
 | 
						|
  paged into main memory.
 | 
						|
  3. Even with a cache of loaded shared libraries, the dlopen() based approach
 | 
						|
  makes more system calls, because it has to load one or two shared libraries
 | 
						|
  for every encoding in use.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
* Total size
 | 
						|
  In the dlopen(3) approach, every shared library has a symbol table and
 | 
						|
  relocation offset. All together, FreeBSD iconv installs more than 200 shared
 | 
						|
  libraries with a total size of 2.3 MB. Whereas libiconv installs 0.45 MB.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
* Extensibility
 | 
						|
  The dlopen(3) approach is good for guaranteeing extensibility if the iconv
 | 
						|
  implementation is distributed without source. (Or when, as in glibc, you
 | 
						|
  cannot rebuild iconv without rebuilding your libc, thus possibly
 | 
						|
  destabilizing your system.)
 | 
						|
  The libiconv package achieves extensibility through the LGPL license:
 | 
						|
  Every user has access to the source of the package and can extend and
 | 
						|
  replace just libiconv.so.
 | 
						|
  The places which have to be modified when a new encoding is added are as
 | 
						|
  follows: add an #include statement in iconv.c, add an entry in the table in
 | 
						|
  iconv.c, and of course, update the README and iconv_open.3 manual page.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
* Use within other packages
 | 
						|
  If you want to incorporate an iconv implementation into another package
 | 
						|
  (such as a mail user agent or web browser), the single library approach
 | 
						|
  is easier, because:
 | 
						|
  1. In the shared library approach you have to provide the right directory
 | 
						|
  prefix which will be used at run time.
 | 
						|
  2. Incorporating iconv as a static library into the executable is easy -
 | 
						|
  it won't need dynamic loading. (This assumes that your package is under
 | 
						|
  the LGPL or GPL license.)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
All conversions go through Unicode. This is possible because most of the
 | 
						|
world's characters have already been allocated in the Unicode standard.
 | 
						|
Therefore we have for each encoding two functions:
 | 
						|
- For conversion from the encoding to Unicode, a function called xxx_mbtowc.
 | 
						|
- For conversion from Unicode to the encoding, a function called xxx_wctomb,
 | 
						|
  and for stateful encodings, a function called xxx_reset which returns to
 | 
						|
  the initial shift state.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
All our functions operate on a single Unicode character at a time. This is
 | 
						|
obviously less efficient than operating on an entire buffer of characters at
 | 
						|
a time, but it makes the coding considerably easier and less bug-prone. Those
 | 
						|
who wish best performance should install the Real Thing (TM): GNU libc 2.1
 | 
						|
or newer.
 | 
						|
 |